Sunday, October 31, 2021

Moral Foundations Questionnaire

Moral foundations theory is a social psychological (Links to an external site.) theory intended to explain the origins of and variation in human moral reasoning on the basis of innate, modular foundations. It was first proposed by psychologist Jonathan Haidt (Links to an external site.) in his book The Righteous Mind (Links to an external site.).

The five foundations are:

  • Care: cherishing and protecting others; opposite of harm
  • Fairness or proportionality: rendering justice according to shared rules; opposite of cheating
  • Loyalty or ingroup: standing with your group, family, nation; opposite of betrayal
  • Authority or respect: submitting to tradition and legitimate authority; opposite of subversion
  • Sanctity or purity: abhorrence for disgusting things, foods, actions; opposite of degradation.

Learn how much you value each of these moral foundations by completing this Moral Foundations Questionnaire (Links to an external site.). First you need to register. If you're not yet 18, please fudge your birthdate so that you can take the survey. The registration process will ask you quite a few questions about your religious and political beliefs. Please take your time and think carefully about these questions, doing your best to understand and answer them. Remember, you are contributing to scientific research!

After registering, click on the link at the top/center in blue that says Explore Your Morals. The second study listed is the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Click where it says Take Study to the right.

Once again, be deliberate and thoughtful while considering the questions in the survey.

When you finish, read the information on the results page and see your results chart. Right-click that image to save it as a .png image file.  Then submit your image file here.

See the example below (which are my results, by the way).

 



Friday, October 22, 2021

One of My Career Highlights.

You gotta love that 3rd paragraph! (The student had written an entire paragraph arguing that gays and lesbians shouldn't be allowed to get married because their parts don't fit together correctly.)



Santa Monica City Busline #7

From Sights and Insights, Monterey Peninsula College. Allston James, Editor. May 1983.

Back when I thought I might be a writer, or photographer, or both. Strange semi-autobiographical journaling that blends Dragnet style narration with my favorite song lyrics of the day. This was shocking stuff for Monterey Peninsula College in 1983.









Friday, January 8, 2021

A Young Man's View of the AIDS Epidemic

Back in 1985 when I was working on my B.A. Degree at San Francisco State, I was taking a sophomore composition class and for some inexplicable reason, the professor didn’t require us to reference any texts in our essays. In fact, I don’t remember reading anything at all in that class!  His whole schtick was “Multicultural Composition” and he encouraged us to go out and explore the subcultures of San Francisco, which I took as reason enough to make nearly everything I wrote gay, gay, gay. And he loved it. That class was an easy A. Anyhow, after over 30 years, I just reconnected on FB with the subject of this essay I wrote for that class, a man named Heinz Peter Furter. I had just met him at the time, but we went on to have a fabulous two-continent affair -- sometimes here in CA, sometimes in Berlin -- that went on till 1987 or so, and then we fell out of touch. Until now! It’s sort of a lame essay, but my teacher loved the first person, so I went for it. A bit embarrassing too, as I’m so young, so earthy-groovy hippy-dippy-trippi, so self-confident, as only a 24-rear-old can be. Now I'm nearly 60 and don’t know shit.  Anyhow, it’s sort of fun to remember what it was like to be a young gay man in San Francisco in 1985.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Jeff Mitchell 
Eng. 214 - Multicultural Composition 
San Francisco State University 
28 May, 1985. 

A Young Man's View of the AIDS Epidemic 

As a gay man, the AIDS epidemic has given me considerable cause for thought and reflection, not only on how it is affecting me personally, but also how it might affect the entire gay population as a sub-group of society. Accordingly, this health crisis has resulted in a change in my personal sexual habits, but a change is occurring in other areas too. Suddenly, the way I intimately engage myself with another man is potentially deadly. The psychological and emotional effects of this situation are causing a new awareness to develop within me regarding the inter-connectedness of love, intimacy and sex, and I'm sure this awareness is developing within many other gay men as well. Although the AIDS crisis is a horrible and terrifying thing, this new awareness I speak of can only result in a great surge of spiritual growth for gay men, those of us who live, and this spiritual growth can only be for the betterment of the whole of humanity. 

I was in a "dirty bookstore" looking at porn, images of men engaging in anal intercourse. "Unsafe Sex". It had been so long since I had even considered doing such an act myself that I felt as if though I was looking at something from a distant past, something one might learn about in a Gay History class. I thought to myself, "See how we used to make love." 

I am involved in a non-monogamous relationship, in which I may enjoy sex outside of my relationship with David, and still consider him my primary source of emotional and intimate contact. My "lover", if you will. It is a situation that works well for us. 

I met a man from Berlin. He has a lover there of seven years, and they too have a mutually agreed upon "open relationship" in which they are free to engage in sex outside of it. This was Heinz's first visit to America. America: The Land of the Free, and the Home of the AIDS. Heinz and I spotted each other in a bar, were attracted to each other, and ended up at my apartment. But before we even left the bar he asked me, "Is safe sex OK with you?" I had never had that question put so directly to me before. Of course, I told him that would be fine with me. 

It hasn't been that big of a deal for me to give up fucking and sucking. Those were physically fun things to do, but I find that the most pleasurable part of sex for me is that extreme feeling of bonding and unification that occurs. And yes, this CAN happen without sticking your penis in an orifice. Heinz and I had some of the most intense and satisfying sex that I have ever had, but there were mini-crises all along the way. When men make love, there comes a point when the next logical step is penetration, in one form or another. This is when a gay man is forced to make a decision that may virtually affect his very life. I don’t think I've ever wanted to take that next step as much as I wanted to that night with Heinz. But my higher self, my common sense, and the fact that there was no pressure from Heinz made it easier to control these urges. The urge that I did have a hard time controlling was my urge to kiss. Since saliva is now considered to be a questionable carrier of the AIDScausing agent, French-kissing is classified as "possibly safe sex". So being as AIDS-conscious as he was, Heinz would not kiss me anymore than a dry brushing of the lips. Now this, I had a hard time accepting. Because of some fucking disease that they don't know the cause of, won't fund the research to find out about, and some say is God’s way of punishing homosexuals, I can't kiss the person I'm making love to! Just imagine if every person, gay or straight, were being asked to make the re-adjustment gay men are being asked to make. Imagine telling a newlywed couple, "Enjoy your honeymoon, but you can't fuck, suck, or kiss!" What will be the long-term-effects of these restrictions placed upon gay men? Those who can't adhere to them will simply die off. The homosexuals who survive this plague will be those who have been able to rise above their sexual urges to explore and create new ways of human expression and intimate contact. 

Heinz and I talked about this. In his broken English, he told me about the deep, committed and satisfying love he had for his mate back home. Though they both engaged in safe sex outside of the relationship, the mutual love and respect they shared caused their relationship to have a more stable foundation than most heterosexual marriages do. Because of this love, his love for himself, and even his love for me, his new-found American friend, Heinz had an easier time than I did making choices during those "mini-crises" when we were getting it on. 

We talked a lot about priorities. What's more important, satisfying that "now" urge, or being able to kiss our lovers without worrying about if there's disease on our lips? We talked about the chain of caring and love we'd created. Not only had we protected ourselves and each other, but our lovers as well. This knowledge filled me with a good feeling, better than anything I may have felt had I decided to engage in unsafe sex. Instead of the warm closeness that Heinz and I were now sharing in each other's arms, we probably would be hastily buttoning up our jeans and saying a rapid goodbye, our minds racked with worry over what we may had just done, not only to ourselves but to our loved ones also. 

Heinz left the next morning, back to Berlin. Though I may never see him again, the short time I spent with him made a lasting impression on me. It put into motion my thoughts concerning this whole AIDS crisis. The closeness I shared with this man, and the implications of what we did have changed my feelings on the purpose and possibilities of a "one-night—stand". Since they can't be the out-and-out sexual free-for-alls they once were, I see them now as a chance to have an extremely intimate encounter with another human being, an opportunity to give and receive the love we all have in us and is meant to be shared. Whereas before, everything was so penis-oriented and getting off was of primary importance, the emphasis can now be placed on using the time together as a chance for real human closeness, no matter how brief that time may be. 

Something inside me tells me that these little episodes of shared love and intense human exchange can only benefit the human race as a whole. I think that every loving encounter between two people puts that caring energy into motion, and it multiplies and snowballs throughout the consciousness of all people. Those of use who survive this plague will be able to go on and define this new way of being with people. We've had the sexual revolution, and the opportunity that gave us to explore and expand our limits in that area of human relations. Now, for whatever reasons, it is no longer safe to use all forms of sex as a way of expressing ourselves. So be it. Let it go. With the emphasis taken off of sex as our primary form of intimate relations, we are now free to explore and engage in the many other ways there are to be nice to each other. 


Heinz, in 1987 or 1988


Heinz & Walter, in 1987 or 1988


Me and Heinz in my mother & Betty's den,
in 1987 or 1988




Tuesday, November 10, 2020

Always Travelling, Never Arriving . . .

When I was 25, in 1986, I cut this out of a newspaper and taped it to my kitchen cupboard in my little apartment on Euclid Avenue in San Francisco. Even then, I knew how my life would unfold.



 

Sunday, September 13, 2020

The Dead Are Gone: Harvey Milk and Me

When Harvey Milk was assassinated on November 27, 1978, I was in my senior year of high school in the Los Angeles suburb of Hawthorne. I was at that stage of life when I knew I was queer, but hadn’t fully figured out yet that I was gay. I honestly don’t have any memory of Milk's and Moscone’s murders, Dan White’s sham of a trial, or the White Night Riots, although  I must’ve seen and read news reports at the time since these obviously were huge stories. What I do have a very strong memory of is the prior year’s anti-gay ballot initiative Prop 6, the Briggs Initiative, which would have barred gays and lesbians from teaching, and which Harvey so famously campaigned strongly against. 

Working as the announcer that year for the school band during a football game half-time show just after the initiative didn't pass, I made an impromptu, unscripted reference to our band director, who was widely rumored to be gay, announcing over the loudspeaker: "... and Mr. Morgan would like to personally thank each and every one of you for voting NO on Proposition 6!" Needless to say, I was never let in front of the mic again! When I graduated high school in 1979, disco was in full swing and sexual freedom was at its peak, though I wasn't quite ready to join the party just yet. But when I began taking those initial, tentative steps into the gay community in the early Eighties, the AIDS epidemic hit, and all the gay lib frivolity that I had just begun to get a taste of vanished almost as fast as thousands of young gay men were beginning to.

By 1982, I was fully out, and quickly becoming an activist, inspired in large part by this book, which began my radicalization (and which I still have, and is which still rather provocative, almost 40 years later!) So when Randy Shilts published The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk on February 1, 1982, I was first in line at my local B. Dalton Booksellers to buy it, and devoured it in one sitting. Thus I first learned the details of Harvey’s life story, his dreams and accomplishments, and his tragic premature death.

On November 1, 1984, I was in the audience at the Castro Theatre when Rob Epstein’s film The Times of Harvey Milk premiered in San Francisco. By then, I had been living in SF for 11 months and a man I was dating at the time somehow managed to get us tickets. I was working at Gramophone Records, which was right across from the theater, and when I saw the line snaking down Castro and turning the corner on to 18th, I got off work early so I could go get a spot in line. The theater was packed to the gills, and after they let in all the VIPs, we still ended up in the balcony, way up in the corner of the theater, where the seats are really tiny. I will never forget that evening, only because of the incredible group catharsis that occurred. To say there wasn’t a dry eye in the house is a major understatement. To this day, I never again have experienced a circumstance in which such a large number of people were openly sobbing in public. Milk’s murder was only 6 years in the past at that point, this was his hometown, and the theater was full of people who personally knew him. And those that didn’t actually know him, like me, had already begun to canonize him. So much sadness and grief in the Castro Theater that night. The queers were full of tears, but little did we know what great devastation and despair was headed directly our way.

When Dan White committed suicide on October 21, 1985, I had been in SF for almost two years and AIDS was fully “happening” by then, although not yet for mainstream America. I was volunteering for both the Stop AIDS organization and the Shanti project, and was fully immersed in the SF Gay Community – politically, socially, and recreationally. As word of White’s demise spread, queers spontaneously began to gather in the Castro to celebrate, growing in number until the cops shut down Castro between Market and 19th. We were all singing “Ding, Dong, The Witch is Dead” from the Wizard of Oz, and I remember how happy we all were – momentarily -- until the party became more somber and turned into yet another candlelight down Market Street to City Hall, a well-worn path that gays had been trodding since the days of Harvey’s activism, a route that showed no sign of being decommissioned any time soon due to its continued heavy use now for AIDS vigils. Yes, Dan White is Dead. Hooray! But Harvey still is too, and hundreds more are dying weekly.

Fast forward 23 years to 2008, and Hollywood finally gets around to its biopic treatment of Harvey, a film I’ve probably seen 5 or 6 times, since I used to show it in my classes. I’ve seen Epstein’s film even more than that, since I used to show that in my classes as well for many years. Yet I find that, at this point in the assignment, I feel wrote-out, and I haven’t even discussed the films yet! I will say briefly that I prefer the documentary over the biopic, although that’s usually the case for me. I’ll echo my critique of Frida for Van Zandt's film: I’ve got no major complaints with it. It’s got cred, with good queer participation in its production, and it reintroduced Milk to a whole new generation of people. (Plus, I'm in it, and you can see me if you know where to look!)

Fast forward again to 2020, and I find myself feeling like Harry in Leslea Newman’s short story that’s obliquely about Harvey Milk. The dead are gone, many of them have been gone for a long time now, one just went yesterday, and pretty soon, I’ll be gone too. What a long, strange trip it’s been. But Harvey’s quote about a bullet through his brain busting through every closet door had a profound effect on me when I first read it back in 1982, and he inspired me to pursue my path as an educator and activist. I hope that I have had a similar effect on some of my students. In this manner, we are indeed “still here” even after we’re dead.

Friday, September 11, 2020

On Harvey Milk, despair, and letting the past be the past.


When doing a close reading of this photo of Harvey on the History.com webpage, here's what I see:

I’ll start with Harvey himself. He looks kind, “a mensh with a heart of gold” to quote Harry in Leslea Newman's short story, and in this pic, he has a peculiar Mona Lisa half-smile. Maybe he’s a bit tired? He’s known for the tremendous energy he brought to his work. He’s also known for his rumpled suits and disheveled hair, both of which are on display here. I wonder if Anne Kronenberg took this photo? I know she was a photographer, but I don’t see her credited for the pic.

On the wall behind him is what I’m assuming is an SF District Map, although I can’t be certain. But that would make sense given Milk’s position and his dedication to his job. There’s a blurry photo of Milk speaking at a microphone – perhaps taken by Dan Nicoletta? – that looks like a publicity still from the “Milk” film!  There’s lots of sticky notes tacked to the wall (before they were sticky) with various names and phone numbers, and notably, what looks to be a business card from a sheriff’s or police department, all of which reflect Milk’s intense commitment to working across a broad range of communities to achieve common political goals.

The most interesting thing to me in the photo is that 50-gallon steel drum! What the hell is that? Is that where he dissolves the bodies? There are also cardboard boxes stacked to the ceiling behind a very dirty and disorganized bookshelf. Clearly, he’s not in his City Hall office (at least I hope not), assuming this is after his election, which I suspect it is, given the tie. Maybe this is his office in the camera shop? I’ve seen some pictures taken there, but they weren’t “behind the scenes” as this appears to be.

So overall, I’d caption this photo: Another day at the office with Harvey.

OK. Now that I’ve composed myself somewhat after reading Newman's short story, I’ll try to share my thoughts about it: 

Given the state of the world – politically, environmentally, pandemically – (as I write this at 11am on Wednesday, it still looks like orange night outside) – I tend to cry rather easily these days. I feel like I’m grieving for something nameless, lost forever. I’m not clinically depressed – not any more than any of us have a right to be, given the circumstances -- I'm just easily prodded to tears, usually when watching TV. So when Newman gets down to serious business halfway through her story, when Harry gets pissed off and asks “She wants we should cut our hearts open and give her stories so she could write a book?” and lets loose with the story of Izzie and Yussl, I just let myself feel the pain of having the scab ripped off along with Izzie, and sobbed away in front of my computer.

The older I get, and the crappier the world gets, the more I try to filter what what I let myself think about, since it's just so easy to slide down the pole into grief and despair.  In this way, I’ve become like my mother was, especially regarding films and other art forms. I remember once when I was 19 or so, “Carrie” was on TV. I was a huge fan of the film, but my mom had never seen it. I called her into the room to watch the final few minutes of the film, knowing it would give her a great jolt when the soft-focus, beautiful-music images of Amy Irving wrench into the shot of Carrie’s hand pulling Amy into the grave in Hell.  Well, my mother nearly had a heart attack and then got pissed-off at me. I remember her saying “I just don’t want to put images like that in my head” which I thought was funny at the time, but now I know what she meant. I fully realized this when I tried to watch “Requiem for a Dream.” It was undoubtedly a spectacular film, but one I couldn’t bear to watch.

To bring this back to Newman’s story, sometimes I think “never forget” may have limits, which I never would have conceded in my youth. Now, sometimes I think it’s best to say the past is the past. The dead are gone. Memories are often unpleasant and sometimes are best left unremembered. As Harry says, “Better to live for today.” This becomes more acute, the older I get.

I find myself identifying quite strongly with Harry these days.

 

Work Cited

History.com Editors. “Harvey Milk.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 7 June 2017, 
          www.history.com/topics/gay-rights/harvey-milk.